This statement of scientific publication ethics serves as a code of ethics for all parties involved in the process of publishing a scientific journal, including the journal manager, editor, reviewers, and authors. The Scientific Publication Code of Ethics is based on three core principles:

1. Neutrality – free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications.
2. Justice – giving proper authorship rights to those who are entitled to be recognized as authors.
3. Honesty – ensuring publications are free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism.

Duties and Responsibilities of the Journal Manager

1. Determine journal name, scope scientific, periodic, and accreditation if required.
2. Determine editorial board membership.
3. Defining connection between publisher, editor, Mitra Bestari, and other parties in something contract.
4. Respect confidentiality, okay for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and Mitra Bestari.
5. Apply norms and provisions about right on riches intellectuals, especially right creation.
6. Do review policy journal and submit it to authors, editorial board, Mitra Bestari, and readers.
7. Develop a code of conduct for editors and reviewers.
8. Publish journal in a way regular.
9. Ensure availability source of funds for sustainability publishing journal.
10. Build network work same and marketing.
11. Prepare licensing and aspects legality other.

Duties and Responsibilities of an Editor

1. Bringing together need readers and authors,
2. Strive improvement quality publication in a way sustainable,
3. Implementing processes for ensure quality work published writing,
4. Putting forward freedom have an opinion in a way objective,
5. maintain the integrity of the academic record,
6. Convey Corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies if required,
7. Responsible for the style and format of manuscripts, while contents and everything statement in manuscript is not quite enough answer author/writer,
8. In a way active request opinion authors, readers, Mitra Bestari, and member of the editorial board for increase quality publications,
9. Push he did evaluation to journal if There is findings,
10. Support initiative for reduce error research and publication with request author attach form Clearance Ethics that have been approved by the Commission Clearance Ethics,
11. Support initiative for educate researchers about ethics publications,
12. Review effect policy publication to attitude authors and partners best friend as well as fix it For increase not quite enough answer and reduce error,
13. Own thought open to opinion new or other people's possible views contradictory with opinion personal,
14. Not maintaining opinion myself, the author or party the third one that can result in decision No objective,
15. encourage authors to revise their manuscripts until they are suitable for publication.

Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewer

1. Get task from the editor to examine manuscript and deliver results review to the editor, as material determination eligibility something manuscript For published.
2. Reviewer reviewers must not evaluate manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest, well in a way direct and No 
3. Guard privacy author with No disseminate results corrections, suggestions and recommendations with give criticism, suggestions, input and recommendations
4. Push author/writer for do repair manuscript
5. Review return manuscript what has been repaired in accordance with standards that have been determined.
6. manuscripts should be reviewed in a timely manner according to the journal’s style and scientific standards based on rules scientific (method data collection, legality author, conclusion, etc.).

Duties and Responsibilities of Authors

1. Ensure that which comes in in the list of authors fulfil criteria as author/writer.
2. Responsible answer in a way collective For work and content article covering methods, analysis, calculations, and details.
3. State origin source power (including funding), both in a way direct and No direct.
4. Explain limitations in study
5. Respond comments made by partners best friend in a way professional and precise time.
6. Inform to the editor if they wish to withdraw their manuscript.
7. Make statement that work submitted writing for published is original, not yet once published anywhere in language whatever, and no currently in the application process to publisher other.